-->

Pages

Sunday, October 29, 2023

Reframing Moloch

 Let us consider the notion of Moloch in terms of the view that "All things that have a beginning have an ending". Some patterns to note:

  • When the situation is not the way we would like / want / expect, we seem to need to invent a causal agent. We have invented the devil, dark matter, Moloch, the other, the system, the incentive, ....
  • The connotation of this agent can be positive or negative (guardian angel vs the devil). That connotation affects our neurology. That affect colors our reasoning. Our reasoning is always (?) motivated reasoning. And that motivated reasoning is affected by our affects. (Too much affect?)
  • Consciousness transformations can lead to very different perspectives on this ( and other ) issues and lead to statements like: Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. or the four noble truths, the eight fold path, the exhortation to love, to be at peace, The Power of Now, ....
  • Perspectival changes include seeing ourselves as part of the meta process of how we parse and interpret reality and try to make sense of it. Often leaving out that any perspective leaves out of it the "rest of infinity". A depth of caring and love affects us as we try to make sense of the world in that "miasma" of simulated pain
  • ????????????????????
Below is a conversation I had with an ai (google bard) about this.

Friday, October 6, 2023

Sense making and literacy

 Another way to think about the notion of sense making is thinking of it as "literacy" in reality. So a person who can "read" is not necessarily good at "reading" and understanding reality. The degree of understanding of reality is a measure of a person's level of literacy. Think of literacy in this metaphor as a spectrum. It is not a binary condition of being literate or not. Rather it is more a measure of the degree of one's being "one with the way" where the way is reality. Or being congruent with truth where truth is a dynamically evolving understanding of reality. Given this view of literacy, it seems like the larger percentage of humanity is lower on the spectrum of literacy than the common view of literacy.


Moral Foundations and Human Development

 I have done several posts on Haidt's Moral Foundations model. Another thought occurred to me about looking at the underlying structure and integrating it with a human development model. One of the things that happens in human development is the increase in the capability of level of abstraction. Given that, one can then question the moral foundations criteria:

CriteriaContextTangibleAbstraction level 1Abstraction level 2
Care/harmfor / topersongroupprinciple
Fairness/cheatingfor / ofpersongroupprinciple
Loyalty/betrayalto / ofpersongroupprinciple
Authority/subversionof / ofpersongroupprinciple
Sanctity/degradationof / ofplace / personplaces / groupprinciple
Liberty/oppressionof / ofpersongroupprinciple
Depending on the stage of development of a person, one can see the moral criteria being applied to different "objects". Objects can be tangible or intangible.